[ 1 ] | |
[ 2 ] | |
[ 3 ] | |
[ 4 ] |
EuGH, Urteil v. 21.2.2018, C-518/15 (Matzak), Rzn. 49 ff. |
[ 5 ] | |
[ 6 ] | |
[ 7 ] |
S. Mutterschutz. |
[ 8 ] | |
[ 9 ] | |
[ 10 ] | |
[ 11 ] | |
[ 12 ] | |
[ 13 ] | |
[ 14 ] | |
[ 15 ] | |
[ 16 ] | |
[ 17 ] | |
[ 18 ] | |
[ 19 ] | |
[ 20 ] | |
[ 21 ] | |
[ 22 ] | |
[ 23 ] | |
[ 24 ] | |
[ 25 ] | |
[ 26 ] | |
[ 27 ] | |
[ 28 ] |
EuGH, Urteil v. 21.2.2018, C-518/15 (Ville de Nivelles/Rudy Matzak). |
[ 29 ] |
EuGH, Urteil v. 9.9.2003, C-151/02 (Landeshauptstadt Kiel, Jaeger); BAG, Beschluss v. 18.2.2003, 1 ABR 2/02. |
[ 30 ] | |
[ 31 ] |
EuGH, Urteil v. 21.2.2018, C-518/15 (Ville de Nivelles/Rudy Matzak), Rz. 60 unter Verweis auf EuGH, Urteil v. 9.9.2003, C-151/02 (Jaeger). |
[ 32 ] | |
[ 33 ] | |
[ 34 ] | |
[ 35 ] | |
[ 36 ] | |
[ 37 ] | |
[ 38 ] | |
[ 39 ] | |
[ 40 ] | |
[ 41 ] | |
[ 42 ] | |
[ 43 ] | |
[ 44 ] | |
[ 45 ] | |
[ 46 ] | |
[ 47 ] | |
[ 48 ] | |
[ 49 ] | |
[ 50 ] |