| [ 1 ] | |
| [ 2 ] | |
| [ 3 ] | |
| [ 4 ] |
EuGH, Urteil v. 21.2.2018, C-518/15 (Matzak), Rzn. 49 ff. |
| [ 5 ] | |
| [ 6 ] | |
| [ 7 ] |
S. Mutterschutz. |
| [ 8 ] | |
| [ 9 ] | |
| [ 10 ] | |
| [ 11 ] | |
| [ 12 ] | |
| [ 13 ] | |
| [ 14 ] | |
| [ 15 ] | |
| [ 16 ] | |
| [ 17 ] | |
| [ 18 ] | |
| [ 19 ] | |
| [ 20 ] | |
| [ 21 ] | |
| [ 22 ] | |
| [ 23 ] | |
| [ 24 ] | |
| [ 25 ] | |
| [ 26 ] | |
| [ 27 ] | |
| [ 28 ] |
EuGH, Urteil v. 21.2.2018, C-518/15 (Ville de Nivelles/Rudy Matzak). |
| [ 29 ] |
EuGH, Urteil v. 9.9.2003, C-151/02 (Landeshauptstadt Kiel, Jaeger); BAG, Beschluss v. 18.2.2003, 1 ABR 2/02. |
| [ 30 ] | |
| [ 31 ] |
EuGH, Urteil v. 21.2.2018, C-518/15 (Ville de Nivelles/Rudy Matzak), Rz. 60 unter Verweis auf EuGH, Urteil v. 9.9.2003, C-151/02 (Jaeger). |
| [ 32 ] | |
| [ 33 ] | |
| [ 34 ] | |
| [ 35 ] | |
| [ 36 ] | |
| [ 37 ] | |
| [ 38 ] | |
| [ 39 ] | |
| [ 40 ] | |
| [ 41 ] | |
| [ 42 ] | |
| [ 43 ] | |
| [ 44 ] | |
| [ 45 ] | |
| [ 46 ] | |
| [ 47 ] | |
| [ 48 ] | |
| [ 49 ] | |
| [ 50 ] |